Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label writing. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 14, 2016

Episode 74: Anxiety and Endings

I started this blog some five years ago with an episode on anxiety.

I don't think I come across, necessarily, as an anxious person, and as I explained in that first episode I never considered myself anxious until "later" in life, maybe even in my forties. This wasn't too bright of me, because I'd had nearly crippling anxiety after starting new jobs more than once by then. I'd been a shy, awkward kind of kid, and though I sort of blossomed in high school I've never felt overly comfortable among people I don't know. I still don't, but I've learned to fake it better.

On the other hand, I'm not much of a worrier on a day-to-day basis. I can relax fairly easily if I do not have any uncomfortable tasks hovering in the near future. This situational anxiety, however, has gotten worse and worse over the years and, at this point, I'm pretty sure it has to do with my neurodegenerative condition, many of which affect patients' ability to get motivated and start new tasks. (These tasks need not be uncomfortable, difficult, or negative, in fact. Just switching from one mode to the next becomes incredibly difficult.)

Tonight, however, I'm facing one of my least favorite tasks, and, hence, I'm writing my blog--er, rather, producing another episode of The Mary Dell Show.

Although my various diagnoses and related severe energy/sleep problems forced me to give up full-time work a few years ago, for the past couple of years, I have been teaching one section of English 101 (freshman comp) at the local state university in town.

This is the perfect part-time job for me. All those years of school have not been utterly wasted. I can still impart my wisdom (such as it is) to a fresh new crop of young adults making the transition from home to their first year living with roommates, doing their own laundry, managing their own time, and facing college-level courses. Young people at this age inspire me. The world has not yet beat their ideals out of their systems, as I often fear it has mine.

Before my illness got the better of me, I was a full-time college English professor, a job I'd aspired to when enrolling as a freshman myself at the age of thirty. I had two little boys at home as I pursued my dream. "Why would you become an English major?" I was asked again and again. I was old enough to know, wasn't I, that no one made any money as graduate in English?

Actually, as I've grown older I've become far more interested in the sciences, particularly ethnobotany, but I still do not think I'd trade my English degrees. I was a book nerd long, long, long before that was ever considered cool. I've written stories and poems and journals since I was a child and even wrote three (unpublished) novels in my twenties and thirties.

I love the written word, especially the beautifully written word. Oh, I know all about postmodernism--I was a graduate student at the height of "high theory" in literary and cultural studies during the mid-1990s. I know privileging certain types of literature over others is conservative and old-fashioned. But I love my "Great Books." And I also welcome other types of literature into the canon.

But I digress. The point is, I mostly love my job as a teacher. Mostly. Frustrations exist, as any teacher will tell you. But the worst part of the job, for me, is what is happening tonight: I despise grading. Not just because it is a chore, but it is a chore. Because of my energy issues, I am not on campus more than about four hours a week. I have to bring my students' papers home with me to grade. So here I sit. Computer on lap. TV on for company. BAD study habits, I know. The TV should be off, but the sound of voices on low volume is comforting. Grading is a lonely job.

I finally decided that one reason this final night of the semester is so difficult for me is that it is an ending.

Now, I am not the "mother substitute" type of teacher at all. I maintain a fairly distant demeanor in class. I'm friendly, and I prefer to keep things on a comfortable basis, but I rarely tell stories about my life outside of the classroom unless it is directly relevant to the topic I'm discussing. I used to tell more stories when I was a full-time teacher. I was younger then; perhaps I've grown more serious over the years. I used to like making students laugh. For someone who'd grown up morbidly shy, the power of owning a room is intoxicating.

But all that was before I got so sick, and before my eldest boy got so sick, and before I lost my full-time teaching job because of being so sick, and before I had to give up working full-time as a successful grant writer because of being so sick. I guess I'm more serious these days.

And so I look at this stack of papers and think about the seriousness of my task. Each one of these papers represents a young person who is hoping for an A. Very few of those papers represents an A paper. I have worked with struggling writers for fifteen weeks. What I can say is that those papers are going to be far, far better than the first papers these students turned in back in September. I can say that many aspects of their writing has improved, in some cases dramatically.

What I can't say is that they demonstrate a fluent understanding of punctuation and grammar--though, in nearly all cases, the student's punctuation and grammar has drastically improved over the semester. Are all the papers free of major errors, such as those having to do with correct sentence structure? No. Well, from what I can see, correct punctuation and grammar is mattering less and less these days. I'm horrified by this, of course, but it's a reality. But this still doesn't mean punctuation and grammar don't matter. I'm not ready yet to throw in that towel.

I try to impress upon these kids, for that is what they are--yes, they are adults, but they are young adults, and I'm nearing sixty, so to me they are kids (and quite often act like kids but, at other times, amaze me with their maturity and strength)--that, in fact, grammar and punctuation do matter. And, off the Internet, in the "real world," I do think that is true. Companies value employees who communicate well in person and in writing. And correct grammar and punctuation are vital for producing clear, well-written materials.

Knowing punctuation and grammar is my superpower.

It's not going to save lives. But writing might. Writing has. 

I want my students to have these tools so that they can go forward with powerful personal agency and be advocates for themselves and others.

So tonight is difficult. I want to see these students succeed, but I know I'll face papers that have errors that will take away from strong content. I'll face papers in which students haven't correctly cited a source, one of the key skills they are supposed to learn in my class and one that I've stressed since day one. I hope that, in all cases, those problems will be minimal and will not cause the student to fail this last of four papers. They cannot revise this last one. This is it.

Whatever the reason a student does not learn basic sentence structure--poor teaching/curriculum in schools, lack of interest/motivation/study skills by students, learning disorders, whatever--those problems cannot be entirely "cured" in fifteen weeks. And that is painful for me.

So many of my students this semester worked hard. They revised papers that did not pass the first time, in some cases for each of three previously assigned essays. They care about what they are doing. These are the ones I want to give an A just because of how far they have come. That, alas, is not what my employer expects me to do, and I know that maintaining academic standards is important. It still kills me.

And this is it. Since I only teach this one class, I won't see these students again. I'm a little sad about that. And so I'm anxious. I don't want to judge these kids. I just want to support them. Damn, I hate grading. Better get to it.

Friday, June 27, 2014

Episode 38: Weeds and Wonder, OR Stalking Euell Gibbons

A wrong attitude about nature is almost an integral part of our culture, and all the crying we're doing about the environment is going to come to nothing as long as such an attitude persists.
                                                               --Euell Gibbons, 1972, qtd. in Smith

I'm channeling my Euell Gibbons tonight. Children of the sixties and seventies knew Euell as the craggy naturalist picking cranberries in the snow to add to his GrapeNuts breakfast cereal. We saw him on popular talk and variety shows. And we laughed at Tim Conway's impersonations of him on the Carol Burnett Show.

If you are a child of a different generation, here is a video of one of this iconic forager's commercials to get you up to speed; his cache in popular culture is not greatly diminished today, forty years after his death.


"Ever eat a pine tree?" Gibbons reportedly asks on one of his GrapeNuts commercials, but thus far I've found no video proving it. (A chapter in one of his books, though, is similarly titled.) I've watched the two commercials referred to above, and neither mentions pine. Another claim with this possible myth is that, later in that ad, Gibbons compares the taste of GrapeNuts to that of wild hickories. However, he does say that in the commercial posted above, and I doubt he'd make the same claim in a second commercial. I suspect the true speaker of that line may have been Tim Conway or some other impersonator spoofing Euell. Gibbons does, however, devote one chapter of Stalking the Healthful Herbs to white pine, which he states was a major food for Native Americans, though his experiments with it, he stated, never eradicated its turpentine-like flavor.

N.B. I was recently scolded by a math professor in my writing group when I insisted that Wikipedia is not a reliable scholarly source. He cited a new academic journal article in which researchers compared the information on the popular free, open-source encyclopedia to more authoritarian sources and claimed Wikipedia is just as accurate as they are. I don't believe it, though I'll often go to the site first to gather information, then verify it with the references given in the text or through my own research. In fact, the pine tree commercial Wikipedia cites is linked to its "source," the video posted above in which cattails are the wild food highlighted. In neither that nor the cranberry commercial is a pine tree mentioned. Ever the librarian and, hopefully, scholar, I maintain that quoting from Wikipedia does not enhance one's credibility whatsoever. That doesn't mean the site is useless; it just doesn't belong in a scholarly bibliography. 

See the end of this article for a list of my sources; those providing unique information are also cited within the text of this "episode."